It seems odder to me to just throw out a 60 game sample from last season as irrelevant but yet cite a 30 game sample this season as a success. The production from last year still mattered. Since we were a playoff team it could have mattered a lot. The same logic applies to guys like Grisham and Davies. Yes, you can't close the book on the trade, but you have to take into the account the production they've already given, too. Grisham and Davies would have been crucial pieces for us last year, but we did not have them, and Urias and Lauer gave us no return on investment last year. I throw them out, not because it didn't matter to the Brewer's success, but because it is a terrible way of gauging a player. You are telling me that you will look past their prior seasons of success and the success that both have had this season because you are disappointed in their 2020 year?