I think this is exactly right. And, of course, the TV contract is probably the single largest source of revenue for a team, or at least the most stable. Without a revenue-sharing model (which I don't think we'll see any time soon), the incentive is to protect that stream. It's better for individual teams to have an exclusive product than an accessible one. Granted, I think it's better for MLB as a whole to have more viewers and a more accessible product (more people watching globally=more cash in the end, not to mention all the other brand benefits), so we're in a situation where self-interest doesn't really serve the whole. I'd love to see a radical, innovative approach as the CBA gets discussed over the next year (players give on salary cap, owners allow some form of modified revenue sharing and promise players, including minor-leaguers, a greater share of incoming $$), but I think a work stoppage and then a patchwork fix is far more likely. All this stuff seems to be the offshoot of an economic model that's heavily tilted toward billionaire owners. Until they decide to operate under a radically different paradigm, fans might be stuck.