This is cool. Thanks! Melvin feels to me like a "bridge" GM, and someone who performed well in that role. There was a lot of talent on those teams from about 2006 on, really. A few bad years, some tough injury luck, but that tenure shouldn't be overlooked. As for the playoff structure and format, I've been thinking about that too. I think 12 (NFL-style) is the best number in terms of excitement, rewarding success, and balancing the actual bracket. So I'm on board. Two minor concerns I have with the 12-team bracket: 1) A division winner in a really tough division could easily be a 3-seed and have to go through a random best-of-3. Maybe that's no big deal. It's not in the NFL. But baseball is so different, and the idea of not rewarding a division winner doesn't sit quite right with me. When the league expands to 32, going with two divisions per league would fix that. That's probably what I'd like to see. 2) Scheduling might be an issue. As of now (pre-pandemic), season ends on Sunday, WC on T/W, DS on Th/F. That's 4 and 5 days off for division winners. I don't think you want them sitting around for any longer than that. You could squeeze those three games series in without an off day either before or after if you wanted. Maybe that's the way to go. Otherwise, one option is to actually shorten the season slightly to 158 games or something and let division winners play a few exhibition style if they want and start those 3-game series simultaneously with that. Everyone else can play for fun/gate/stats. Maybe you even just count those 3-gamers as regular season games if you want for stats purposes (really getting into the weeds here, I know). I think 12 is a good number. 16 is too many. 14 is hard to bracket.