You can't really think like that, though. If Aaron Rodgers throws a perfect bullet to a wide open, usually reliable receiver who then tips it into the hands of a defender, he cannot say, "was that the wrong decision?" You do it again next time. Same goes for decisions closer to 50/50. Keep making the best decision for the situation at hand. Trust your process and the results will come (they clearly did over the first 163 games). Today, the exact same situation could present itself (say a righty is on the mound in the 3rd for COL to make this example better) and it could break that Granderson was needed late in the game and that using Santana first worked out. While I understand the point, I think the analogy doesn't really hold. A receiver dropping the ball is a contingency that should never into the calculus. Using a very good PH early and not having him in a higher-leverage situation should always be considered. It's an inherent drawback. And I like the idea of letting process evolve to a point. You shouldn't radically recalibrate, but, just like a hitter adjusting to a different pitching approach, a good manager to me is looking at ways to fine tune strategy. Maybe that's not what's going on. I don't really think it's that big of a deal. But, as much as I love Keon, I love him for his defense and speed, and I want to avoid a situation where he has a bat in his hands high-leverage (especially when you couldn't even use his D because then you'd have to remove Braun).