It’s a subjective term, but I think the offense has been generally scuffling. Sure, it’s been feast or famine, but a feast wins one game and several games of famine to go with them will usually produce a losing record.
The fact that the Brewers Pythagorean projection is 19-11, 3 games better than their actual record, is a reflection of those “feast” games.
My comment about scuffling is focused on the more recent games. In the 20 games since the 8-2 start the Brewers have scored 92 runs, a healthy average of 4.6 per game. But, 38 of those runs have come in 3 games. In the other 17 they scored 54 runs, a not so healthy 3.2 runs per game. Not surprisingly they went 5-12 in those 17 games.
Another way to look at it is that in the 4 games in which the Brewers scored in double figures their run differential is +43. In the other 26 games it is -5. If you take away their 4 most lopsided defeats, those are only by 6, 6, 5, and 4 runs (-21). The biggest wins have a much bigger impact than the most lopsided losses.
I guess we could quibble about whether the Brewers offense has been “generally scuffling” but the fact that the 4 double digit games have an oversized impact on both the run differential and the runs scored per game seems undeniable. What you’re calling “feast or famine” I am calling “generally scuffling with an occasional explosion.”
Also, my comment should be taken as purely backward looking. Of course I know about the injuries, and hope that the return of Chourio and Vaughn, and then Yelich can help reduce the “famine” part of the offense.