Yeah, that would be my recommendation too....at least get through 11 innings before starting with a runner on 2nd. With it going straight to starting with a runner on 2nd to start the 10th, it almost feels a bit like teams should be awarded points in the standings ala hockey, where wins count as two and getting into extras but losing still counts as 1. I get the reasoning behind trying to end extra inning games before they drag on past 12-13 innings....but then again I looked at a fangraphs article about this: During the 2019 season, only 8.6% of all games went into extras. 208 total games. 95 of those games ended after 10 innings, with 57 more ending in the 11th. That left just 56 out of 2,429 games that went 12+ innings. And thinking of how these revamped extra inning games go - I'm pretty sure they probably take just as long if not longer to complete each inning. So if MLB was hoping this was a way to reduce game times or wear and tear on players/pitchers, I think it has backfired. Sure, it's prevented marathon extra inning games from happening, but the format is how we go from a 2-1 score into the 9th with Saturday's game and wind up with a 9-6 final in 11 that still took 4.5 hours to complete. How did it backfire? Backfiring would mean that it made things worse, not that it hasn’t completely resolved a problem. The fact that extra inning games are now almost always completed in one or two innings that have action and scoring threats and don’t use up as many pitchers accomplishes something positive both for fans that don’t want marathon games and teams that don’t want to have to cover 15 or more innings. I’d rather have a 9-6 11 inning game that takes 4.5 hours than a 3-2 17 inning game that takes 6 hours. A lot more extra inning games now are like Friday’s with a quick resolution.