I know you are a Garza apologist, but even to try to argue that a guy who should have given up 3 runs while committing an error, giving up 'only' two hard hit hits in just 3 2/3rds , didn't deserve to lose the game, is on a whole different level. This also ignores the fact that Marinez stranded 2 inherited runners from Garza, so Garza actually could have easily given up 7 or even 8 runs. Yes, if we have absolutely zero expectations of Garza compared to any replacement level call-up, he did fine. The line says he gave up 5 runs, so he gave up 5 runs. Don't become one of those hockey apologists who say "X played better than it looks and deserved to win."