One could certainly say the same thing about Parker. Even better, one can say that about Parker after seeing him play pro ball. You really have to cross your fingers on draft picks that they don't totally bust out immediately, even such high picks. at some point you just can't keep on getting the flavor of the month and find players to build around with NBA experience. Its why Philly trading MCW after 1.5 seasons didn't make any sense. Parker looked like a guy you can build around in his brief time in Milwaukee. The point however is that Giannis and Parker may not be able to play together. Both are ideally suited at the 4 (Giannis does command a bit of ballhandling). It could very well be a fatal flaw in our strategy to win a championship...look around the NBA at the combinations that are most successful. CLE - Irving (PG) / Lebron (SF) GS - Curry (PG) / Thompson/Green (SG/SF) Spurs - Parker (PG) / Duncan (PF) OKC - Westbrook (PG) / Durant (SF) BOS - Rondo (PG) / Pierce (SF) / Garnett (PF) MIA - Wade (SG) / Lebron (SF) Notice a trend? All of them had a POINT GUARD and a Forward they built around. Yes, Wade played point even though Chalmers was out there. As it stands right now we have a guy in Giannis who could end up being a SF or a PF, and an undersized PF in Parker. It all hinges upon MCW and whether he can become elite or not...while I think he will become a good PG, I don't know about elite. We don't have very much of a sample size to know for sure whether this will work or not, but I fear that Parker is not the fit for the team we need...not that we had a choice in taking him. It's why I wanted Wiggins, but it just didn't work out on draft night.