Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

tmwiese55

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,016

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by tmwiese55

  1. tmwiese55
    Only half the time? I'd call the new Coordinator hire a success if he can get that level of improvement
  2. tmwiese55
    Yea I was surprised Rengifo checked out bad at 3B too, didn't think they'd get a guy like that. However, in this specific discussion you can't ignore that Rengifo can play every position on the field. Suarez is bad 3B, other options being 1B/DH and we have those spots covered. Rengifo's flex provides tons of defensive value. Was even more surprised when I saw Urias get less money than him and that he checks out very good at D at 3B. I know I'd have gone with Urias. My guess is they really think there is a Rengifo hitting bounceback possible to be in the realm of his 23/24 seasons. Whereas they think Urias is what he is and doesn't have that upside.
  3. tmwiese55
    I looked it up yesterday and ticket weren't crazy like stated above. Could get in the low 100s as of now. Sure, not cheap especially if you're paying for a bunch of kids. But also its in the realm of any real sporting event. And keep in mind any seat in the building is perfectly fine since its such a small stadium. In addition, price is almost for sure to drop by gameday. Its a 10k ish stadium and they have no local fans. I'm a vegas regular so will for sure go and likely go to 2 games. I'll be surprised if I pay over $100 per ticket and I'd guess in the $80 area. I think it'll be fun because its such a small stadium and it will be 80% Brewers fans. ETA: also I assume all games will be at night so temps won't be ridiculous
  4. tmwiese55
    If the Os think so little of Mayo (that's a bad sign) and have all these people blocking him. Perhaps the price wouldn't be as high as being discussed. If you got him at a good value, sure do it. But wouldn't want to give one of our two best relivers and/or really valued controlled Ps.
  5. tmwiese55
    My guess is that Peralta trade was independent of this and not caused because of money being tight due to Woodruff. My guess is it was more about getting the value on him before FA and not risking injury. So IMO, not offering Woodruff would've been them being cheap like everyone accuses them of, instead they paid up for him now 3 years in a row when they didn't have to. So then if we had 22 mill more to spend I really don't see a feasible move via FA to address OF/3B/SS. that makes a huge difference Maybe instead of Renfigo they pay more for Urias (if that's why the chose him instead) or maybe a midlevel OF of some kind happens like an Austin Hayes, Adolis Garcia, Bader type. I guess it gets Suarez involved in that money though, that could be the one "needle" moved if he happens to have a good year. However, I just don't think his type is on MKEs radar. But overall, the team would be in a worse spot imo. No Woodruff and only a slight upgrade at one position.
  6. tmwiese55
    Generally like him and Abrams as targets. But yes I'd agree in today's trading world that I don't think we should have to give up that much. And if so, probably hold tight and focus on other options. Someone like Abrams should be a lower price and fits our main position of need this year. You'd control him for 3 years, so this year when he's desperately needed. Then one more as hopefully some prospects start poking their heads up in 27. Then he'd likely be traded in the following offseason assuming the youths are looking good.
  7. tmwiese55
    Also, it is the market. If the ticket prices were cheaper, they'd get resold on open market because people are willing to may more. The general public is willing to pay for the entertainment experience and the money has to go somewhere. People are willing to watch on TV or pay subscriptions to watch it, if they charged less for them then its the owners of the networks making the big profit. This is just capitalism at work
  8. tmwiese55
    I do think that technically the ref himself is supposed to be counting separately, but I'd have to double check. So in theory, in a situation the operator was slow to start the clock the ref could call it before it hits 19. But for the purposes of what the twitter obsession was about, the people were wrong in how the clock is supposed to work. And then in this case, its clear the operator started early so this possible gray area of the refs count would be clearly in UWs favor.
  9. tmwiese55
    It is 20.6, that's why it hasn't been 10 until it hits 19. There's a whole reddit thing too. This is all blown up nonsense and the operator screwing it up made it closer than it seemed. Then compound it with people on twitter jumping the gun (including their coach i think) rather than double checking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_line_(basketball) Google AI: In NCAA college basketball, the 10-second backcourt violation is officially signaled when the shot clock displays 19 seconds. While some debate exists regarding clock accuracy, the standard, correct ruling is that 10 seconds have elapsed once the 30-second shot clock counts down to 19 (meaning the ball has been in the backcourt for over 10.0 seconds). Key details: The Trigger: The countdown starts when the team gains control in the backcourt. The Visual Cue: When the display changes from 20 to 19, the 10 seconds have elapsed, and a violation occurs. Context: This rule applies to both Men’s (30-second clock) and Women's (30-second clock) basketball. Technical Note: Some, this Reddit user notes, argue that a whistle at 20 seconds is technically premature based on how 20.99 seconds is displayed, but 19 is the accepted, standard violation time.
  10. tmwiese55
    Surprised to see that defensive info on him. Adds some fuel to any Turang to SS, Ortiz to 3B discussion ETA: quick look, Ramon Urias seems to be top notch at D. Seems he'd have made more sense but maybe they value the switch hitting or he's gonna be a few mill more, or two years. Considering his brother came back to the franchise last year, I doubt there's some bad blood from letting him go a few years ago
  11. tmwiese55
    It has to be showing 19 before its a violation. Regardless, in this case the operator started it early and it would've been total bs to have that affect the end of the game. In addition, there's still frames of Boyd across the line with it still saying 20. This is a blown up non issue.
  12. tmwiese55
    Yes they're not gonna bring up Quero to play once every 7-10 days. I don't see how anyone was expecting that to happen. If Contreras goes down I'd expect him to be up though and playing at least half the games, assuming things go well for him this year. Besides being bad for his development, its also bad for the brewers long term to use up a year of service not playing
  13. tmwiese55
    "Boston’s front office may be impatient, but they’re not stupid, and likely to trade away a young controllable arm if they feel the player is close to developing into a TOR starter,.... So it’s not arrogance it’s skepticism ground in reality. " Boston literally did this last year.
  14. tmwiese55
    Going back to the talk a bit ago about the traditional thought on 3B power and hitting in general made me remember a few days ago when MLB network did their list of top 10 3B right now and I thought to myself how weak it is these days. It really doesn't take much to be an above avg 3B now, surprisingly weak position. A theory, perhaps advanced analytics have made teams realize the defensive value so some good hitters who 30-40 years ago would've hung at 3B (while being bad at D) are now getting moved to corner OF/1B/DH.
  15. tmwiese55
    Not sure I get the thinking here. Have to remember it was for 1 year of Williams. We'd have literally 0 right now if we kept him. Instead, we already got one year of Durbin which would generally be the equivalent of the one year of Williams. And now we have two pitching prospects and 14ish years of control on them, that if they pan out at all makes the brewers come out way ahead in the deal.
  16. tmwiese55
    Just did a quick glance at still available FA infielders. Most likely name that could make sense is Ramon Urias. Passable vet that won't cost much that I'd rather play than Hamilton
  17. tmwiese55
    Also, if Paredes was available for a reasonable cost you'd think Bos would've just gotten him rather than Durbin. He was rumored as a fit there right away when Bregman left due to the monster being perfect for his all pull game
  18. tmwiese55
    The Over/unders were out at least last week sometime. One was 83.5 and another 84.5. I will be invested in this as I have the last few years. For the most part, you can just bet MKE and Cle overs every year and clean up. I just looked at caesars and cubs are +115 and MKE is +250. Last year we were +350
  19. tmwiese55
    Thats fine, yea I'd say I'm fine if they don't sign one at all. But I think they will due to what other said of so few innings eater guys and so many on limits. So I think they will, and he seems to fit the bill well enough and has the relationship. If I remember correctly his peripherals and him looking like 'washed' so to speak has looked that way for years, But he keeps getting adequate results. Also that's why he's so cheap, people have been thinking he's done for years. And nbd if he does get beat up and you let him go since he's so cheap. Also, IMO I think the time we'd need a guy like him is early in the year rather than late. So I'd rather have him ready right away than waiting and seeing while paying more money on a montgomery type. Let the young guys ease into the year and be fresher for late in the year/playoffs But yea, I'm fine without and if need arises later you grab the equivalent of a Civale type midseason
  20. tmwiese55
    My guess is they're in very close contact with Quintana for this role. He seemed to click well with the team and bought into what they're trying to do, good mentor for the young guys. I'd just give him his 4-5 mill and be done with it.
  21. tmwiese55
    Yes that's generally my take too. An unknown thing factor in that to us as fans is whether MKE is open to Turang at SS. I'd add one thing, that having Vaugn already is a factor here and if you could've known Suarez at 17 mil or Vaughn at 7.5 which would they choose. I think we'd probably go with Suarez, but there was no way of knowing that 3 months ago.
  22. tmwiese55
    Don't get me wrong, I'm generally fine with trading prospects other than true elites in your Made/Chourio class. But folks acting like prospects never pan out or at such a bad rate seem to be forgetting all MLB players were prospects at one point. I randomly grabbed a 2018 top 100 list. A lot of the players became solid contributors and of course tons of big stars https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/top-100-mlb-prospects-2018/ top 10: 1. Ronald Acuna | OF | Braves ?? 2. Shohei Ohtani | RHP | Angels ?? 3. Vladimir Guerrero Jr. | 3B | Blue Jays ?? 4. Eloy Jimenez | OF | White Sox ?? 5. Victor Robles | OF | Nationals ?? 6. Gleyber Torres | SS | Yankees ?? 7. Nick Senzel | 3B | Reds ?? 8. Bo Bichette | SS | Blue Jays ?? 9. Fernando Tatis Jr | SS | Padres ?? 10. Forrest Whitley | RHP | Astros ??
  23. tmwiese55
    Yea had fingers crossed there but I'm guessing that 2nd year was enough to rule us unless he dropped to like 2/15. 1/10 I think I'd be good with it for sure but I see their hesitation on 2/20ish. That said, they've had no issue using 8-10 mil per on the Mccutchen and other types, and of course 18 on Hoskins. And they'll have a lot of money clearing the books next offseason so personally I'd have been up for it. At the least you know Bader is good at D while being at least a competent hitter Hopefully they have something up their sleave for a proven hitter of some kind but my guess is their hoping Mitchell stays healthy, and then have Perkins/Jett after that. And if those fail there is the obvious deadline move, I bet Mark Canha will be out there.
  24. tmwiese55
    Who knows how it all shakes out with Jett at SS or OF in the 26 season. I guess first thing lets hope he's good enough to make MLB this year. A lot after that will be dictated by injury and performance of the returning guys on where he plays. But we know injuries will happen and rest days are needed. So at the very least as a floor it should massively reduce the ABs of the Dunn/Siegler/Lockridge/Camerons. Which of course helps the team if he at least somewhat lives up to his prospect status. Don't think I've seen info on how his CF/OF D is? Basically, assuming Mitchell gets hurt will they consider him good enough at D to play him or is he an automatic no go for the Brewers standards? Especially with Perkins gold glove sitting there
  25. tmwiese55
    I'd say generally fine with it and with both prospects. Seems like they have a good chance. though I'd be curious on how the Baty discussion went, you'd think he's very expendable there and we had a clear need for him. My nitpicks would be having to give up Tobias too, he's still controlled for several years and in the MKE system I was confident he'd be a good contributor and at the least great depth. Wish they could've found a different less immediately valuable second piece instead. Second, that it helps our direct competition for 2nd best team in the NL. It essentially filled the only hole the had left on the team.
×
×
  • Create New...