Please feel free to elaborate on the differences, possibly without insults like "lazy" and "crazy" this time? For reasons already mentioned by other posters, I don’t think I need to regurgitate things you’ve already been told. The direction of the team wasn’t the same, Farve’s decline was a bit more obvious and Rodgers hasn’t been threatening to retire constantly. Of course Rodgers was also a much more touted prospect versus Love who I don’t think was even a projected 1st round pick (could be wrong on that). I really don’t buy the concern with Rodgers declining either. It was one year where is was really good instead of great, in a new system to boot. His stats were still really good. Favre on the other hand really hadn’t been all that great for years. Heck, you could go back to 1998 and see where Favre was starting to not be that special of a player anymore. There are arguments for taking a QB, but I just don’t like the Favre situation as a comparison. That was much more obvious.