Sure there are, but how many of them are really good - a significant upgrade on what a team already has as their starter? A handful are, but that's also because what we have for starters really aren't that bad. Pina grades out roughly average overall. Kratz is a below average vet with an excellent presence, and for all we know Nottingham could take a step forward this year. He had a pretty solid season overall last year and has an excellent work ethic. And you took my comment incredibly out of context anyway. I was referring to the market on Realmuto overall, not directly related to the Brewers. A majority of the teams I listed will probably be content with one of the lower cost options available...and there are enough that each team could get a solid option and leave the Marlins with no market. Multiple GM's have gone on record saying how ridiculous the Marlins asking price is. Their two most aggressive suitors have signed alternate options and are basically out on Realmuto. This argument of "Realmuto is good and at a scarce position, therefore X team should give up their top prospects" is a terrible argument and it keeps happening. Realmuto is not going to be as valuable as many of these top prospects over their entire team control. Hiura for example I would argue is likely to put up a higher WAR over the next 3 years than Realmuto will in the next 2, and at a lower cost...and then we'll have 3 additional years of likely even greater production beyond that. This exact scenario is the same for Robles, Acuna, Bellinger, Verdugo, etc...this thought process isn't specific to the Brewers. That's why so many on this board consider Hiura or Burnes for Realmuto to be crazy, and why teams are calling out the Marlins for their insane asking price. I really wasn't taking your comment out of context at all, let alone "incredibly". I got what you were saying, and didn't see the need to quote an entire lengthy post, so I just included the line on which the entire argument seemed to be based - a statement which seemed to completely miss the point of my original comment. I was referring to the market in general too, not the Brewers - see the last line of my post that you were responding to: "I don't think that I want that team to be the Brewers, but I think that someone will pull the trigger...". I thought that it was clear that my post was referring to the market in general, and not the Brewers, but if that wasn't clear then I apologize... And, by the way, from what you're saying, I think that we both voted the same way in the poll about catching... we don't disagree on that...