I don't know if I agree on this part....just far, far too many unknowns at this time, but I like the direction we're moving and feel like Stearns is going to keep that window open year in and year out. But I'll just say across the board, I don't see any reason to extend ALMOST any reliever with whom we have multiple years of control left. Look at how many guys we've had who've dominanted and then struggled BADLY shortly after. Axford, Kolb(to a lesser degree, but he had a good year), Turnbow. There seem to be about 40 relievers in baseball each year who were great the year before who become terrible and 40 who go the other way. That's a bit of hyperbole, but still. It's just too volatile a job and we have him through him prime for 3 more years. That's perfect. Why take on ALL the risk ourselves? This is exactly why I think we should look to trade Knebel. Relievers are so volatile and teams are more than willing to give up prospects for relievers that have dominant years. There will be a bullpen piece this year that will surprise us and have a great season that teams will be interested in paying a premium for next offseason. Three years of Knebel could really help replenish the farm. Those prospects could then be packaged in a big trade for a guy like Kluber or used midseason for an upgrade. I think we could move Knebel and have another guy step up and have a productive season in his place, allowing us to use resources to solidify a different area of need such as getting a top of the rotation arm.