Yet here we are with the team's #1 RB signed to an extension. Dillon will make a fine #2 during his next 3 year tenure. If I draft a RB in 2021 am I not drafting for the future? RBs are easily replaceable. Team had 2 quality RBs, not 1 or 0. What Gutey did was guarantee his first 2 picks were not going to see the field without injury. Your comment acts like if I were making the draft selection that player wouldn't have a future on the team. My thought process is that with a 2nd rd pick Im drafting a player that should fill a need in that season. Dillon and Love were neither. As to Deguara another RB/TE hybrid. So we needed him why? Tonyan, Sternberger, Williams, Jones, and Lewis? Yeah he got injured by 2nd game but tell me where are these snaps he was going to play without a major injury as #4 behind both RB and TE. Wheres the logic in this draft when your rookies make the biggest impact of any major sport the same year drafted? I've always felt that good, well-run teams should never feel obligated to use the draft to acquire multiple 1st year starters/high-end contributors. The Packers have long had a draft-and-develop philosophy, and while they may have failed to get to the Super Bowl "promised land", that philosophy has led to long-term success for the most part. I have no problem with the Dillon pick, despite Jones re-signing, because the idea of a bell-cow NFL back is antiquated and nearly dead. Most every successful team has two if not 3 backs that they rotate. As for Deguara, I think Lafleur and Gute fell in love with the idea of having their own version of Kyle Juszczyk. And considering the 49ers just recently decided to pay that 30-year-old FB $27 million over the next 5 years, it is obvious that there are certain schemes where that position is highly valued.