Jump to content
Our free agent ranking is up to 100 names, and now you can filter by player position! Click here to check it out! ×
Brewer Fanatic

HarveysWBs

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,367

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by HarveysWBs

  1. HarveysWBs
    Anti-Midwest bias, and McCarthy’s appearance. Just my two cents.
  2. HarveysWBs
    Very unnecessary hit from Clowney. Would be a shame for Philly to lose Wentz on a play like that.
  3. HarveysWBs
    Nah, makeup calls are only in baseball. In the NFL, the league is all about telling the fans not to believe reason and their own eyes. Hence, "we did review it [in only 10 seconds] and determined there was nothing that rises to a foul on the basis of visual evidence [that we care to explain to you peons]." We've always been at war with Eastasia...
  4. HarveysWBs
    Going to get criticized a lot more if Brees doesn’t touch the ball in OT. Every time I wonder "what would it have been like if Green Bay hired Payton and not MM?" I remember, there's probably a reason he's only won one Super Bowl with a Hall of Famer of his own, and it isn't all bad officiating. That being said, Saints fans are going to have more officiating controversy to get worked up about after this one.
  5. HarveysWBs
    The longer this goes, obviously, the more I want a Saints win. I want the team with extra hits and extra minutes on their bodies coming to Green Bay, not San Francisco.
  6. HarveysWBs
    These thoughts have crossed my mind, as well. But then again, matchups aren’t apples to apples like that. Maybe the Vikings just match up well against the Saints, or maybe the Saints are having one of their flat weeks out there. What we know is that the Packers have not been outmatched by the Vikings in our two meetings this year, and in fact have looked quite comfortable for most of those games. While I suspect the Packers could do well vs. the Saints in Green Bay, this is such a quirky sport that I’m not confident enough to necessarily prefer them over the alternatives. I guess what I’m saying is that nothing the Packers do against anyone (besides beating the Ravens in the Super Bowl) would shock me, so it’s hard for me to find strong rooting interests so far this postseason.
  7. HarveysWBs
    Watching Taysom Hill play makes me sad. Every single time.
  8. HarveysWBs
    Time for Wisconsin to get cold again. Enough of this global warming business. I’ll keep my car parked and walk to work for the next two weeks if it gets the tundra frozen between now and our (likely) matchup with New Orleans.
  9. HarveysWBs
    Dang it, Seattle
  10. HarveysWBs
    That’s as close as you can get... holy cow
  11. HarveysWBs
    So I’m thoroughly convinced the Packers aren’t really good enough for this to likely matter, but I don’t know if I’d rather play San Fran or the team that swept them. But either way, I’d rather it goes down at Lambeau.
  12. HarveysWBs
    Kittle is an absolute nightmare. We would have no answer for that guy.
  13. HarveysWBs
    All’s well that ends well.
  14. HarveysWBs
    Thought Crosby missed it...
  15. HarveysWBs
    Rodgers’ best throw was that delivery on the screen.
  16. HarveysWBs
    Defense just went 3 and out.. Admittedly, that was an emotional response. Figured the lions could get into Prater’s FG range.
  17. HarveysWBs
    This is 100% on Rodgers. He lost this game.
  18. HarveysWBs
    Defenders for lions have been arriving early all game, and now you call offensive PI? Horrible, but predictable.
  19. HarveysWBs
    Lazard!!
  20. HarveysWBs
    There are my lions. Let’s go, Rodgers. Get it together.
  21. HarveysWBs
    No one on this team is laying down the law. It’s cool LaFleur brought a new culture, I guess, but is anyone holding anyone accountable? It starts with being able to tell 12 he has his head up his posterior. LaFleur is a players coach thus far, but people need their butts chewed in that locker room, and I’m not sure anyone in this organization can do it.
  22. HarveysWBs
    Stupid blown coverage by the Rams all but costs the Packers any chance to get home field advantage. That’s disappointing.
  23. HarveysWBs
    Stupid blown coverage by the Rams all but costs the Packers any chance to get home field advantage. That’s disappointing.
  24. HarveysWBs
    The story after this one will be the emerging narrative around LaFleur. Either the Packers get their first road win over a good team (Cowboys and Bears weren’t and aren’t good) in his tenure and his team is showing growth towards being elite, or they lose and the question becomes “when will LaFleur win a big game on the road?” While that is what the story will be, what it SHOULD be is, “will Rodgers ever commit to doing what it takes to get everything he can out of this offense—and himself?” For all the angst about scheme, play calls, and pass catching talent (and those are all valid), Rodgers’ technique has become woefully sloppy of late. His throws are off-platform, he’s doing whatever he wants with his feet; it’s like after watching Favre for years and now Mahomes, he thinks to himself “I don’t need to sweat the technique, either.” Or maybe he’s getting lazy. Either way, he doesn’t have the playmakers to not be precise with his delivery. And now that he’s more reticent than ever to push the envelope and risk turnovers, the offense teeters on catastrophic failure half the time. Is it logical to imagine the coaches don’t know this? Is it logical to assume Rodgers doesn’t know it? And if they know and nothing changes, what does that say about the efficacy of their coaching and the mindset of Rodgers? THAT should be the story if the Packers lose. But it won’t be. And that’s a shame. Either way, let’s just hope they win. Winning fixes everything.
  25. HarveysWBs
    The story after this one will be the emerging narrative around LaFleur. Either the Packers get their first road win over a good team (Cowboys and Bears weren’t and aren’t good) in his tenure and his team is showing growth towards being elite, or they lose and the question becomes “when will LaFleur win a big game on the road?” While that is what the story will be, what it SHOULD be is, “will Rodgers ever commit to doing what it takes to get everything he can out of this offense—and himself?” For all the angst about scheme, play calls, and pass catching talent (and those are all valid), Rodgers’ technique has become woefully sloppy of late. His throws are off-platform, he’s doing whatever he wants with his feet; it’s like after watching Favre for years and now Mahomes, he thinks to himself “I don’t need to sweat the technique, either.” Or maybe he’s getting lazy. Either way, he doesn’t have the playmakers to not be precise with his delivery. And now that he’s more reticent than ever to push the envelope and risk turnovers, the offense teeters on catastrophic failure half the time. Is it logical to imagine the coaches don’t know this? Is it logical to assume Rodgers doesn’t know it? And if they know and nothing changes, what does that say about the efficacy of their coaching and the mindset of Rodgers? THAT should be the story if the Packers lose. But it won’t be. And that’s a shame. Either way, let’s just hope they win. Winning fixes everything.
×
×
  • Create New...