Putting Boras' antics to one side (and I agree, he was always a bit ridiculous, and is now fast becoming a dinosaur) he is not necessarily wrong to complain about the dynamics of the current climate at the end of this CBA. Yes, Boras' big-name clients and other blue chip players of the past decade plus have lived high on the hog and received massive overpays during their declining years. This has been often described as a way to compensate players for their past performance, with many scoffing at this notion. But the obvious core of truth at the heart of this argument is that if the old vets tend to be overpaid, then the young players--from the arbitration guys all the way down to the kids in rookie ball--are massively underpaid in the current system. Minor leaguers in many cases can barely make ends meet, and due to team-friendly aspects of the CBA allowing for arbitration control and service time manipulation, even young stars get nowhere near their worth in some of the prime years of their careers. Now as teams are all in unison about not overpaying for vets, and in a time of record-setting revenue streams all across the game, as ludicrous as it may seem, the players and their representatives can make a strong case that they are not receiving their due. On all of this, I am torn. Being a fan of the smallest market team in baseball means that this team-friendly environment can reap handsome rewards for a team savvy enough to maximize the angles. The David Stearns era (and I'll even give the late-Melvin era a little credit here) has certainly been about doing just that. Yet, I cannot help but fear that as the rest of the league gets just as savvy, those advantages will become nil, and the Brewers will fall behind again due to salary constraints. And, of course, if players remain this dissatisfied, and the owners are unwilling or unable to find a way to strike a balance between overpaying vets and underpaying youth, then labor strife could bring the game to a grinding halt. Long story short, many in this current crop of FAs, including the two big names still out there (Keuchel and Kimbrel) played much of the early years of their career while being paid less than their worth, with the understanding that their free agent deals would make up for it. Now, as their free agency arrives, the owners in unison decide to only pay vets for expected future performance. Both sides are right, and I don't see a way to square the circle, at least for this current group of players.