Renfroe did have some stand-alone value so why would they non-tender him? Just because they tendered him a contract doesn't mean they really wanted the guy. They could have almost certainly have traded Renfroe to somebody else for a lesser prospect. To me it's very clear what this trade was all about. From the Brewers perspective, 1) rid themselves of Bradley 2) rid themselves of JBJ, and 3) add Renfroe. From the Red Sox point of view it was all about adding two prospects they liked. My post was in response to another poster calling him garbage because they traded him. How do you know the view point of the Red Sox? Maybe they considered letting JBJ go as a mistake and wanted him back. Because everything I've read is they really wanted the prospects, they are clearly looking to add another outfielder, they may try to trade JBJ to somebody else (good luck with that one), etc. There is nothing in what I've read that would indicate they plan on starting JBJ so it wouldn't seem he's somebody that features prominently in their plans one way or the other.