You could also just sign a random 17 year old player, kind of irrelevant that a team would trade you one for a guy you are going to release anyway. I don't follow. How exactly is it irrelevant, that doesn't make any sense. The Brewers were going to let a big league player go, and instead of receiving nothing in return they got a lottery ticket player. Weird that you're creating fictional scenarios to argue that receiving a player instead of receiving nothing is a bad thing. It's irrelevant in this sense. I've repeatedly said I suspect Quintana was signed for $10,000. Don't know, just likely. If that is the case, there is no difference in saying we traded McKinney for Quintana or sold McKinney to the Mets for $10,000 and then signed an equivalent player for that same amount. Either way, it's not a needle mover.