I'm not sure how far they have even considered lowering the mound, but the last time they did it for the 1969 season, it was a full five inches. I have no idea, but I suspect it didn't take long for pitchers to adjust and I also doubt injuries were the result. That being said, I'm not really in favor of it but I don't think it would be a big deal for pitchers. Moving the mound back might be different and I'm definitely not for that. At one time I didn't want shifts to be limited. I figured it was on the hitters to adjust. They obviously are unwilling or can't so I'm basically in favor of limiting shifts at this point. Pitchers have gotten too good and hitters need a break. Don't go back to the juiced ball. I think hitters will have to drop the launch angle or at least seriously lessen it with the new ball. That will help batting average along the way as well. They had a way of hitting that got them where they are in the first place, shouldn't be all too hard to go back to what you used to do. At least for most hitters. Definitely in favor of a pitch clock and also limiting the number of throws to first. Perhaps give them a certain number to use all game long. That way if you want to save them for late in the game in a key situation, you'd have that option as opposed to a strict limit per base runner as I think they are employing in one of the minor leagues or independent leagues. Probably should also go back to not calling the high strike. Hitters have no chance against the velocity up in the zone. Particularly with the launch angle. Lower it back to where you had been calling it and pitchers won't be able to just pound the upper part of the current zone and get guys to chase out of the zone.