Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Lucas O.

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,283

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    117

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Lucas O.

  1. Lucas O.
    He has a career 116 wRC+ lol. That’s a really good bat for a catcher.
  2. Lucas O.
    Honestly this is probably a good thing for the Brewers. We aren't competing with the Mets of the world to make the playoffs. Giants were one of the teams we would likely be competing for a WC spot with. The Giants getting worse helps us way more than the Giants being better.
  3. Lucas O.
    How does comparing it to teammates make it any better? It still doesn’t show any context. All the stat shows is how many balls were hit in a players catch radius. It doesn’t show quality of catch, the size of the catch radius. Stats are used to tell stories. The only story RF tells you is roughly how many baseballs were hit in a player’s vicinity. Nothing about the quality of defense they play.
  4. Lucas O.
    It could but you literally have no way of knowing with RF making it ultimately useless.
  5. Lucas O.
    Range Factor is probably the most useless stat I’ve seen. It’s literally put outs plus assists divided by innings played or games played. That does absolutely nothing to measure the quality of plays in CF. It just measure the quantity of plays in CF. It’s pretty much useless as a tool for evaluation because it includes absolutely zero context.
  6. Lucas O.
    This is where a Justin Turner type signing makes sense. Balances that lineup so we don't have 6 LHH.
  7. Lucas O.
    Nobody in the MLB wanted Boxberger at $3M.
  8. Lucas O.
    If the Brewers re-signed those 3 players and signed Shane Bieber their payroll would be well over $150M
  9. Lucas O.
    I had heard about this article but wasn't able to read it because it was paywalled. Why am I not surprised that Lauer is the one who said this? He definitely has developed quite the taste for speaking out to the press (not that it is a bad thing but it has happened both here and San Diego)
  10. Lucas O.
    Was Hiura the number one prospect in baseball?
  11. Lucas O.
    Was Hiura the number one prospect in baseball?
  12. Lucas O.
    Why do you seriously doubt that? He’s the unanimous number one prospect in baseball who had a 125 wRC+ in 130 MLB PA as a young 21 year old.
  13. Lucas O.
    Why do you seriously doubt that? He’s the unanimous number one prospect in baseball who had a 125 wRC+ in 130 MLB PA as a young 21 year old.
  14. Lucas O.
    I wouldn't say Pepiot dominated. He had a 5.42 FIP, 6.69 BB/9, and 26.4% GB-rate in his 36 MLB innings last year. The results were good with the 3.47 ERA but the underlying numbers were very far from dominant which to me means he had a lot of good fortune with his super limited sample size.
  15. Lucas O.
    I'm not saying BTV is the end all be all, but Burnes for Henderson, Hall, Rodriguez is nearly a $100M overpay on BTV. It's not even remotely a fair trade. I doubt Baltimore would even accept Burnes for Henderson straight up.
  16. Lucas O.
    I'm not saying BTV is the end all be all, but Burnes for Henderson, Hall, Rodriguez is nearly a $100M overpay on BTV. It's not even remotely a fair trade. I doubt Baltimore would even accept Burnes for Henderson straight up.
  17. Lucas O.
    Baltimore laughs Arnold off the phone if he suggests that.
  18. Lucas O.
    Baltimore laughs Arnold off the phone if he suggests that.
  19. Lucas O.
    I'm also going to clarify this. Barring a big improvement and season next year he still shouldn't be put on the 40-man next offseason. In 480 PA this season Garcia slashed .259/.300/.407 with a 4.0% BB-rate and 33.8% K-rate. In his 108 PA at A+ he didn't draw a single walk. He needs to make substantial improvements to be deserving of a 40-man spot next offseason.
  20. Lucas O.
    Garcia is rule 5 eligible this winter according to fangraphs. There's no reason he should be put on the 40 man right now.
  21. Lucas O.
    If the Orioles did ask for Burnes it would be managerial malpractice to say Rodriguez doesn’t have to be included. I still can’t see them trading Rodriguez though. Would be such a short sighted move from a team whose window is just starting to open.
  22. Lucas O.
    I’m very high on Henderson as well. His recorded spin rates are elite. There’s a lot of upside there.
  23. Lucas O.
    Pat Hoberg World Series MVP.
  24. Lucas O.
    I was talking age in comparison to when the contracts were signed. Was pretty clear.
  25. Lucas O.
    You said Woodruff's extension doesn't kick in until his final year of arb? Either Woodruff is older and his extension kicks in during 2024 or Woodruff is younger and his extension kicks in for 2023 which factors in two arb years and is too big of a contract. Castillo's contract takes him through his age 34 season. If Woodruff's extension kicks in during 2024 like you said then it would take him through his age 35 season (a year older than Castillo). So which is it?
×
×
  • Create New...