certainly this place is stat-centric, but that's one thing I like about the site in some ways. Other sites are awash with people who make crazy opinions and evidence them with more craziness That's the double-edged sword of statistical analysis of baseball. On one hand, there may be some who are alienated by VORP and FIP and PECOTA being thrown around like the terms we grew up with: run-producer, ERA, and skills. On the other hand colloquial terms all leave a ton of extra subjectivity and the argument can't be settled as easily as when you compare to hitters by OPS and OXS. The lack of objective measures can and does lead to a ton of fighting and nonsense since it's much harder for one side to clearly be seen as right. That's not at all to say constructive examination and criticism of stats can't make for a great discussion, as it has many times on this site. There's also plenty of room for pure opinion and gut feeling, as long as it doesn't go toward nonsense levels of "well, my gut just tells me that Hart is a crappy player, and you won't convince me otherwise."