"Gamel could stand out in LF as effectively as Braun and probably post stats similar to Braun's 2010. " I really disagree with this. Now I'm going to copy and paste something I just posted over on the JSOnline which sums up my take on that argument (I post as Brauntosaurus over there): Gamel could possibly be worse defensively than Braun (though there's no way to know this without seeing him play LF, which I don't think he ever has). As far as his offense, here's what Braun did in 2010: .304/.365/.501, 25 HR, 103 RBI If Gamel put up those numbers, he would probably be a lock for NL Rookie of the Year (if he's still eligible). Saying he could "very likely" do that is pretty misleading. Ryan Braun is one of the greatest all around offensive players this team has seen, ranking up there with the likes of Robin Yount and Paul Molitor. If he continues his current pace, he's a veritable lock for the Hall of Fame, years from now. You don't trade away that kind of player when he's young and cost controlled. Anyway, this whole thing started with pure speculation from Peter Gammons, who is an unabashed BoSawx homer. It's the usual Boston, "We can trade for every good player and every marquee free agent wants to come here," type attitude that they usually display. I remember how Ben Sheets was always "rumored" to get traded there after his stellar 2004 season. They think Milwaukee is a glorified farm club for them, if you go off some of the trade proposals you see suggested by their fans.