A pitcher handles the ball on every pitch, making him the most important player out there - catchers handle the ball on every pitch that isn't hit somewhere, they also call the game back there, and they have a spot in the lineup - the importance of the position can't be overstated. I do agree that the position will always be very demanding, I like the rules change to cut down collisions, but even if a guy never took a foul tip, he still has to squat for nine innings to get paid, and of course he's going to get fouls, backswings, etc. I would never hesitate to take a great catcher in round one, like the Giants did with Buster Posey before they won three of five World Series, but more importantly, I would try to keep a pipeline going at the position. Since the position is so important, and since the shelf life of a catcher can be cut short, I would take one in the first five rounds, every year, all the time. I wouldn't worry so much about moving the guy to a different position later, I just consider that to be another reason why you need to keep 'em coming. If he's a great hitter, he was worth a top pick, even if he winds up at another spot., and at least you got a few years out of him behind the plate. EDIT: I would treat catchers like NFL running backs - use age 30 as the cutoff line. If you've got a Hall of Famer, maybe you extend that a couple of years, but for the most part, expect them to break down at that point. I have no problem taking a catcher in round one, but I'd be much more cautious about giving a 28-year-old catcher a new 5-year contract.