I just never heard this (34%?). I just tried searching, but couldn't find anything that talked about how much teams share from their TV contracts. So, I'm not sure where you are getting this from. I found this article from 2012 that states: "The money from each team’s local TV deal is mostly kept by the team. " http://mlb.mlb.com/pa/pdf/cba_english.pdf on the top of page 121 34 percent of every teams local revenue is put in a pot and evenly distributed among every team also the top 15 markets forfeit and increasing chunk of their revenue sharing money as the years go on. It was 25% last year, 50% this year, 75% next year and all of it in 2016, so the Brewers are getting an increasingly large chunk of that money as time goes on. Perhaps I'm wrong. Perhaps the lower revenue teams are starting to get larger relative chunks of the revenue sharing pie than they were before. However, it still seems as if it's better to be a team that contributes "big chunks" to revenue sharing than a team that receives "big chunks" from revenue sharing. Until I see teams like the Brewers, Royals, Twins, Pirates, etc mentioned in the same breath as the Yankees, Angels, Dodgers, Rangers in the off season as being in the hunt for top free agents it's going to be hard for me to believe that revenue sharing is truly working. Year after year it's the same story. We compete for the likes of Suppan, Wolf, and Garza.....those are our "big" signings. It would be nice not to have to mortgage the farm system for guys like Grienke and Marcum. Until this happens, it will be hard for me to believe that these "large chunks" that are being received are doing anything more than helping the Brewers keep up with the inflation of baseball.