You see, no one ever bothered to talk about the fact that youth, or the younger player is better to have, which is essentially what you're saying. The argument is simply that the younger player is better. I understand what you're saying. It is possible that if something like that is said in say, May though, they might be implying that the 22 year old is young and might get better as they gain more experience as the season goes on, while it's extremely unlikely that the 32 year would be able to say the same. But yeah, in the big picture, it's more a focus on the idea that the young players will get better than they are now in future seasons and the cost rather than them actually being better at baseball, I guess.