http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3384523 Ned's take on Gagne being replaced, calling the idea "ridiculous." Basic translation of the comments: "He's been one of the best before! He just needs to keep battling!!! You guys are stupid for even considering that a closer who blew 5 saves in the first month should be replaced!!" Sigh...that's our manager. #1 - Considering finding a new role in the bullpen for a reliever who blew 5 saves in 1 month is not "ridiculous". You'd be hard-pressed to find a similar situation where the idea of replacing a closer wasn't at least considered if he blew 5 saves in the first month of the season. You can certainly still argue that he shouldn't be, but doing so isn't close to being a "ridiculous" idea. That sounds, once again, like Yost is being stubborn and close-minded when his mind is set on something. I'd be bothered if he isn't at least thinking "Hey, our closer is blowing a lot of saves. If this keeps up, that could lead to a lot more losses. Maybe I should keep my eye on the situation and make a change if need be!" #2 - Please stop citing past success as an excuse for anything, Ned. We don't have 2003 Gagne, 2005 Turnbow, 2005-2006 Capuano, or 2000 Kendall. So don't use those players to justify your reasoning.