I highly doubt most Packer fans had even heard of Nate Hobbs prior to a week ago. The money he got blew his projections out of the water. Not that PFF is the end all be all, but Hobbs graded out at 61.4 last year … Eric Stokes was 61.3.
I think you could probably make a pretty strong case that the secondary is in no better shape, no worse shape … adding Hobbs but losing Stokes and a depth piece like Ballentine.
Look, I’m sure they feel Hobbs is a good fit for Hafley’s defense and I’m sure they have plans for him. I’m not saying he’s a bad addition. But if we’re honest with ourselves, come on, Nate Hobbs, Aaron Banks and Mecole Hardman are not moving the needle one bit from the team we saw in January.
And if you want to say we can’t count Jaire from last year’s team, that’s fine, but then we need to do the same with Watson, because we can’t bank on him for this year’s team at all. On an offense that already lacked weapons, and we haven’t added any.