Again, MLF himself admitted that he badly dropped the ball.
As far as 1) , he had opportunities to have these conversations with Bisaccia as soon as the turnover happened. It doesn’t all just have to happen pre-kickoff.
B ) (?) It’s all part of his job. The “more important things” include clock management. It is all part of a HCs job. I’m not putting the blame on our OC here.
3) Why exactly does MLF need to know how many yards the previous play will gain or lose? He doesn’t. All he needs to know is the exact field position that he’s willing to try a FG at if they face 4th down.
4) Nope, I wouldn’t have, and not even close to the point. I don’t criticize MLF for the sake of doing so. In fact, on the many occasions this year when MLF doesn’t “take the points” and fails on 4th down this year, I defend the aggression. Going for it there was defensible, regardless of result. Going for the FG was defensible, regardless of result . Not being on the same page with your ST coordinator as to what you were going to do is not defensible. Having your ST coordinator shout at you “look at the time!” after the timeout is not defensible.
As an aside, can you imagine Andy Reid or Dan Campbell staring at their ST coordinator after that 3rd down, panicking as to what to do, then burning a timeout to give Love a chance to rally for the game winning FG with 50 seconds left and a timeout? Would never, ever happen.
5) They did lose the game because of the timeout. If the timeout was not called, the Packers almost certainly win. Yes, those other things that you mentioned could have turned the game as well. The horrible defensive 3rd and 15 call lost them the game as well.
The overwhelming consensus, including from MLF himself, was that he did indeed mismanage the clock. He is not above reproach and it is ok to call it out.