Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

adambr2

Verified Member
  • Posts

    39,258
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    106

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by adambr2

  1. Of the recent 1st round QBs (2016 and 2017 not including 2018 since it's too early to evaluate), Goff and Mahomes look like elite franchise QBs for sure, and Watson, Wentz, and Trubisky all look like franchise QBs with normal growing pains along the way. Only Paxton Lynch has been a true 100% bust. Not sure where you are getting that most totally fail or are huge disappointments or that the odds of drafting a replacement are terrible.
  2. If we overhaul everything this offseason, I wouldn't be totally opposed to the idea of trading Rodgers for numerous 1st rounders, drafting his replacement early, starting Kizer for a year before the draft pick takes over, and investing all the extra money and picks into weapons on both offense and defense. I know that sounds crazy.
  3. MM is toast for sure. He used up his mulligan last year. Could see Pettine surviving an overhaul depending on where the new HC is on that.
  4. With the pick the Packers traded to move up 8 spots to get Spriggs, the Bears took OG Cody Whitehair who has started every game of his 3-year NFL career. Nothing like doing your biggest rivals a solid. Bears wanted Spriggs. They had the next pick and traded out after GB took him. Should have let them have the bum.
  5. Only Mike McCarthy would run ISO right up the gut with no lead blocker.
  6. MM @ Seattle, chances of winning after punting on 4th down: 21%. MM @ Seattle, chances of winning if had gone for it on 4th and failed: 20%. Way to 'play the percentages', coach!
  7. Probably not going to happen til at least after 2019 as he would carry a pretty massive cap hit. I'll take the blame for incorrectly making this claim in another thread- as others noted, his deal was structured so that the team has an out after this season, as his cap number will decrease for 2019 if he's cut this spring. I'm 99.9% sure he's played his last snap as a Packer. The only thing that keeps me from saying 100% is the possibility of a significant restructure, which is very unlikely. Do you have a reference for this? Everything I can find on Spotrac and Overthecap jives with what Louis is saying, and an $11M+ dead cap hit is no small matter.
  8. In perspective, I probably haven't given him the benefit of the doubt as much as I should, but he's not necessarily a good coach for here anymore. As others have said, sometimes it just gets stale. I'd also strongly agree with homer on MM's big weakness being thinking on his feet and making spur of the moment decisions. The Seahawks' game was one of the worst coached games I've ever seen for any coach. He constantly made head scratching decisions, and it really came to a head late in the 4th on the missed challenge and punt. Sometimes, he really struggles to apply logic in the moment. The non-challenge, for instance. Ok, you don't know for sure, that's fair. So you need to consider the importance of the play. Is it a 4 yard completion? No, it's a 50 yard completion. Probably, definitely worth the challenge. And the timeout? Well you only lose it IF you lose, and considering you routinely burn timeouts to avoid 5 yard losses, I'd say it's worth rolling the dice on a 50 yard loss. I get that thinking logically in the moment is harder than we make it sound sometimes when you're on the sidelines, but considering it is his professional career, I would expect him to be better at it than most.
  9. Probably not going to happen til at least after 2019 as he would carry a pretty massive cap hit.
  10. Maybe he's literally just telling us he has no idea what the Brewers are thinking in regard to their offseason strategy for 2018-19.
  11. Umm. Wot? If we can afford the salary dump that the Mariners are obviously trying to do, I would make a better offer than that.
  12. We simply can't afford his entire salary.
  13. Holy cow, the frozen hot takes on pages 2 and 3. Not calling anyone out specifically, we've all been there.
  14. My God this has got to be the worst coached team in the NFL. I thought MM was about as bad as he could be in New England, and that was now nothing compared to how bad he was tonight.
  15. I highly doubt we could get Realmuto for Ray, Perlata and Diplan. I'm sure we'd already have him if we could. Seriously? I don't think they could accept that offer fast enough. I hope we do not make that kind of an offer. I would be pretty disappointed. Add Realmuto to the lineup and it doesn't cost Hiura or Burnes? Agreed with Matt, I'd jump all over that and don't think it's nearly enough. What would you be ok with giving up if you're not ok with that?? If you are not okay with making that kind of an offer I don't think there is any reasonable offer that we could make for Realmuto that would even keep them on the phone.
  16. I can understand that a lot more than Baez.
  17. We came within one game of the World Series with Jhoulys Chacin and Wade Miley as our best starters. If there are actually people out there that voted against Counsell because of how he used his pitching staff, they are buffoons who should be stripped of their voting rights.
  18. Honestly, we kick the tires on just about everything. I think I'd be more surprised if we did NOT call asking about Realmuto.
  19. The ESPN estimate was Kluber for Hiura + Santana + Peralta.
  20. I like Pina more than most, but the fact that the team did not even deem him worthy of getting any playing time over Erik Kratz in the second half and playoffs is pretty telling as to how they feel about going forward with Pina as the starter.
  21. Again, it's not speculation. Just a hypothetical in a slow time of year, like someone said. I don't know why it's frustrating to anybody, no one is being forced to participate in this discussion.
  22. I think it's more of just a fun hypothetical exercise moreso than any actual speculation.
  23. The proposals were in direct response to a statement that there isn't a player in MLB that they would trade Yelich for, so yes, relevant responses in that context.
  24. Tristen Lutz is not a high end prospect. He has the potential to be one, but he isn't at this very moment. There is no comparison between him and Hiura in value.
×
×
  • Create New...