I would like to see similar stats computed with negative points assigned to 100-loss and 90-loss seasons. While the Brewers have failed to sustain success, they have also generally succeeded at not being really awful (except for the early 2000s). My other comment is that the Brewers' success strategy in both 2008 and 2011 was generally to sacrifice the future in exchange for short-term success. So it isn't surprising that there was a drop-off in wins afterwards. As long as there are revenue imbalances this is kind of inevitable. Finally, this might be more controversial (and maybe shows my age), but I don't really care what happened prior to 2000 or so. It's ancient history. In the Attanasio era the Brewers have possibly the best ownership group out of any small-to-mid market team. They legitimately care about providing the best fan experience in baseball and delivering a winning product as much as possible given the constraints of being the smallest market in MLB in an unfair system. They haven't always succeeded but they have shown a willingness to adapt and learn from their mistakes. It's hard not to argue that the franchise is headed in the right direction.