Good discussion. 1) They are hired and paid to play baseball and not to do anything on the side. MLB players are the best baseball players in the world, but that says nothing about their personalities. The personality spectrum still has the full range. Of course, baseball players should have good PR skills and be nice to the fans, and in the long run it will benefit them, but the fans value winning the most, so talent is far more important than personality. So no, they are not property, they are employees under contract, and they only have to do what the contract says. Many go above and beyond, but I agree that it can't be expected. Craig Counsell is the idea personable, hard working, local baseball player, but he does virtually nothing to help you win ballgames at this point, which is the ultimate goal. 2) As with any employee working for a company, their obligation lies only with the contract, and when the contract runs out they are free to pursue other venues. I would never expect any player to take a hometown discount, just as I would not be expected to stay at my job in my hometown if an employer across the country offered me a better deal. Furthermore, signing the hometown deal offers little benefit to the player. Look at Joe Mauer. Even if he signed for $150 million instead of $184 million, it wouldn't change that he's fallen out of favor with the fanbase. For someone like Prince Fielder who has no Milwaukee connections except his teammates, it doesn't really make sense to take a discount unless he wants his name up on the wall. If he wants a ring, past odds suggest he should find a team with a higher payroll. 3) Agree completely. This is an example where the employer should provide help, as the Brewers have done with Braddock. It benefits both sides.