Part of the fun of an online Brewers message board is to obsess about every little move that gets made. Even better when there are two or even three or four different perspectives about how moves should be made. It would be nice if every roster move was like the Greinke trade--almost universally heralded by Brewers fans as a significant improvement to the club. Unfortunately, most moves, especially with the last few guys on the roster, are just asking for significant debate. There are good arguments in both directions. The Nyjer Morgan vs. Gomez argument will probably be going on throughout the season and there will be plenty of "evidence" to support both sides once the season starts. What do you do when you have several replacement-level outfielders suddenly hit .350 in ST? They can't all stay on the team and the "losers" can't just be sent to the minors to wait for their turn. I've never seen any of these guys play in person and 50 AB is not enough to judge, so you kind of have to default to management and assume they can determine if Boggs and Cruz are worth keeping or not. Keep in mind that every player on the 25-man roster gets used--and by July there will be at least 30-35 players used and quite possibly more. When players have options it is easy to mix things up, but it makes it harder when you either keep or lose guys like Luis Cruz. The Brewers depth is an advantage in this case and major league-caliber players are getting released. That is bound to stir up debate even if this is a very good Brewers team. It is a very good Brewers team with one of the worst defenses in MLB, and teams with poor defense rarely make the playoffs. There will be harsh repercussions if things go badly in 2011. Depth is always going to be a concern as well. Or maybe we are all sick of Spring Training and really looking forward to Thursday?