To me "injury-prone" means anyone that has shown a historical tendency to being injured, and to me it does not matter if that injury is related to lack of physical condition or just lack of luck. But if we want to know if any observed pattern has a tendency to continue, what we are really trying to find out is if the pattern is being caused by some underlying factor if it is just random. Baseball fans seem to be hard wired to conclude that no pattern is ever a result of just luck. In actuality, random patterns are occurring everywhere we look. The hard part is often trying to figure out which ones aren't random, not the other way around. We all know that Sheets has had an injury riddled 2.5 seasons. No one needs to point that out or create a bulleted and dated list of injuries. The real question is if Sheets' injury history suggests a higher probability for future injury, compared to an average starting pitcher. Now, a reasonable could person could argue that it does and I can accept that. But the argument never even gets that far. We might have some interesting discussions on the subject if it did. but their vision of Brewerfan seems more inclusive of varying points of view and posting/content styles than yours. I suggest we let them set the parameters on these things. Sure, which is why I prefaced my statement with, "It's my preference..." Ultimately, Brian's vision for bf.net is what matters but that shouldn't stop me or anyone else from expressing their preferences.