I'm confused. If the Bucks are really worried about the luxury tax then why did they spend money on Delfino, Warrick, Ukic, Kurt Thomas, Sharpe? Wouldn't it have been cheaper to get multiple years of Sessions for $4m/per then have either multiple year deals (Delfino, Ukic?) or expirings that you'll have to replace again next year. It seems to me that the Bucks downgraded their talent this summer without the attendant savings such an effort should produce. I wasn't a huge fan of Villanueva on the court but the fact that the Bucks got nothing for him and Sessions doesn't smack of good asset managment.