Yes, but those 4 walks in 4 IP didn't show that Gallardo really had good control yet. So? I'll take the guy with less than stellar control but who actually has the ability to get major league hitters out over a guy whose stuff consisted of junk and a prayer. But the bullpen had already thrown 4 IP in Game 1, 4.1 IP in Game 2, and 3.2 IP in Game 3. I don't see how games 1 and 2 matter all that much since there was an off day after game 2. I would be hesitant to know that I would need to get at least 6 IP out my bullpen in Game 4 And they ended up needing 6 innings because Suppan sucks. So once again, Gallardo starts and goes as long as he can, then you still have Parra, Mota, McClung, Stetter, Shouse, possibly Villanueva and Suppan if you need to cover innings. If they win game 4 they go back to Philly with an off day so there's rest for the bullpen and Sabathia starting on normal rest. And, Gallardo's last start didn't really give any indication that he would be so good as to believe that you would be guaranteed 3 scoreless innings. What in Suppan's 2008 season gave us any indication that he would be decent? That's an elimination game, you go with your best option and Suppan clearly wasn't the best option. Other than the walks, which are admittedly important, what was so bad about Gallardo's game 1 outing? Weeks dropped a ball which led to three runs and even with Weeks' error he still should've gotten out of the inning. Cameron had the ball in his glove on the "double". Suppan was awful in September. Even his "decent" start against the Cubs he was getting shelled. The ball was just finding outfielder's gloves.