Late to the party but I like the signing. It's not getting me all antsy in the pantsy but it at least gives us a good chance of having a league average rotation and I think a good chance at 85-90 wins. As for the young pitching/signing FA pitchers debate goes, I think it's easy to be reminiscent of "what could've been". Melvin had to think about getting butts in seats, not just fielding a WS competitor. Of course, fielding a competitor puts the butts in seats, but I think we as Brewer fans became victims of the whole "Brewers have the best farm system and will be World Series contenders by 2008" epidemic that plagued message board and websites in the early 2000's. It always seemed expectations were that we were going to be a dominant team for a quite a few years, which was unfair. Trying to scapegoat Doug Melvin IMHO is unfair. IMHO no other GM could've had the success that Melvin has had. The Brewers have turned around so much; fans are coming out in droves, the team is competitive and in the upper half in payroll. Enjoy it.