Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Game 17: Bears @ Packers - Sunday, Jan 7 3:25 PM


Posted
1 minute ago, adambr2 said:

Seriously, how in the hell? Ball clearly hits the ground and is bobbled before he had anything resembling control. 

And they decided it so quickly. I just don’t get this one.

Chicago delenda est

Posted
1 minute ago, adambr2 said:

Seriously, how in the hell? Ball clearly hits the ground and is bobbled before he had anything resembling control. 

The ball never touched the ground.

  • Disagree 1
  • WHOA SOLVDD 1
Posted

The first replay it looked like the ball hit the ground, but the second angle it didn't.  Bad job by CBS to not show another replay after those two quick ones.

Posted

I honestly don’t know what you guys are seeing on the replay, looked to me like the ball never came close to the ground.  Looked like a clean catch

Posted
Just now, wildcat83 said:

I honestly don’t know what you guys are seeing on the replay, looked to me like the ball never came close to the ground.  Looked like a clean catch

The first replay they showed clearly showed the ball hit the ground. The second one didn't but it was definitely incomplete.

Posted

He has possession with his back on the ground.  That is a td

Remember what Yoda said:

 

"Cubs lead to Cardinals. Cardinals lead to dislike. Dislike leads to hate. Hate leads to constipation."

Posted

I don't ever want to hear the whiners say the refs give the Packer's all the breaks... Crap calls.

"Rock, sometime, when the team is up against it, and the breaks are beating the boys, tell 'em to go out there with all they got and win just one for the Uecker. I don't know where I'll be then, Rock but I'll know about it; and I'll be happy."

Posted
1 minute ago, igor67 said:

If that Bears catch somehow stands that is definitely a touchdown.

 

Because the ball never hit the ground on the Bears catch.  The ball started moving again when he rolled out of bounds so incomplete pass by the weird NFL rules on what is or isn’t a catch but is a catch but isn’t a catch.

Posted

I didn't see possession established there until after he rolled out.

But anybody saying the first one was a catch has to rewatch. The nose of the ball bounced right off the turf. That's the only reason it ended up in the Bears WR's chest. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, nate82 said:

Because the ball never hit the ground on the Bears catch.  The ball started moving again when he rolled out of bounds so incomplete pass by the weird NFL rules on what is or isn’t a catch but is a catch but isn’t a catch.

It absolutely hit the ground. 

  • Like 1
Posted

It’s a catch if his feet don’t hit out.  I don’t think they ruled it hit the ground, they ruled his feet hit out prior to possession.  Feel like that was correct.

Posted
Just now, OldSchoolSnapper said:

It absolutely hit the ground. 

It did not hit the ground please see the 2nd replay where it shows it clearly did not hit the ground.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...