Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Posted
rule-5-draft.jpg.93b1ca8d5c819f1e63435b9
Image courtesy of © Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

Discussing the art of the MLB vs. MiLB phases of protection, here's some background via the ultimate Rule 5 guru, JJ Cooper of Baseball America, and we thank him for these insights:

"Any Rule 5-eligible player who is not on a 40-man MLB roster is available to be picked in the MLB phase of the Rule 5 draft, while all players not on the 38-player Triple-A rosters are available to be picked in the MiLB Rule 5 draft. So, when it comes to the MLB Rule 5 draft, players on the 38-player Triple-A rosters are really the only players who get picked. If a player is available for the MiLB Rule 5 draft, it just makes too much sense to wait and pick them in a draft where there are no onerous roster restrictions.

Similarly, MLB clubs move players who are not Rule 5-eligible off of Triple-A rosters in paper transactions once the offseason commences. It makes no sense for the Twins to leave Walker Jenkins (who finished the year in Triple-A) on the St. Paul roster when that spot can be used to protect another player from the MiLB Rule 5 draft. So, Jenkins has been transferred to the Double-A Wichita roster for procedural reasons. There may be some MiLB free agents whose signings have not yet been made public who are Rule 5-eligible but are not included on projected team lists."


So, these modified AAA rosters are not something that's ever made public by MLB teams or MiLB affiliate pages. The Brewers actual AAA roster for Rule 5 purposes is invisible to us. For Milwaukee, this AAA roster nuance currently affects only one player on Nashville's AAA roster as of its MiLB.com link - LHP Tate Kuehner finished the 2025 season with the Nashville Sounds but is not yet Rule 5 eligible with only three professional seasons under his belt.

The Brewers could place as many as 38 players on the "invisible" AAA roster to keep them from being picked in the minor league phase of Rule 5. In theory, that would only expose two players to the minor league phase. However, it's likely Milwaukee will protect less than 38, perhaps quite a few less.

The first reason for doing so is to allow space for Milwaukee to take players from other organizations in the minor league phase, as the Brewers have often done (Isaac Collins, anyone?). If the team maxed out the 38-player list from the start and didn't lose any player in the MLB phase, there would be no room at all to grab a player like OF Garrett Spain, who the Brewers claimed from Toronto last year at this time, and who remains in the organization.

The second reason a player might be exposed to the minor league phase is in "as a favor" fashion. Going back to 2012, then-General Manager Doug Melvin indicated that infielder Eric Farris had been exposed (and subsequently selected by Seattle) as a professional courtesy in order to provide a better chance at a future career for the player. It's quite possible that of the many players the organization has lost in the minor league phase in the ensuing years, some were left unprotected with similar thinking, though it's rare for a GM to indicate such openly.

The names below are listed by the most recent level in which they saw action. An asterisk next to a player's name indicates that this is their first year of Rule 5 eligibility.

While all these players were certainly reviewed by the Crew's decision-makers when addition to the big-league 40-man roster was considered earlier this fall, only RHP Coleman Crow, on the cusp of minor league free agency, was formally added. Crow was on a list like the one you see here last year at this time, but his injury status had teams wary and (thankfully) he was not plucked by another organization last December. 

There had been speculation that RHP Blake Holub and LHP Brian Fitzpatrick might join Crow on the 40-man this fall. As such, they may be potential targets on Wednesday.

The minor league phase can always lead to unexpected names appearing, both coming and going.

Here's to a productive Winter Meetings for the Brewers, including Wednesday's Rule 5 Draft which concludes the week's events in Orlando.

P.S. The buzz around 40-man roster status and Rule 5 protection and exposure for Crew prospects is going to be over the top insane next year based on the volume and quality of prospects "coming due". There will be plenty of dialogue to rapture us throughout next year's minor league season in preparation for December 2026.

AAA Nashville:

AA Biloxi:

High-A Wisconsin:

A-Ball Carolina:

Rookie Maryvale:

 

View full article

 

Recommended Posts

Posted

Freddy Zamora had a good season in Nashville, and the SS could benefit from what is possibly a "curtesy exposure" to give him a clearer chance somewhere else to get a shot at the majors.

Matt Wood jumps out to me as a possible loss; a catcher who can hit is always coveted.

 

Posted
7 hours ago, izzi said:

Matt Wood jumps out to me as a possible loss; a catcher who can hit is always coveted.

I hope not. I have him higher on the depth chart just after the big top 2, and ahead of Miller and Rodriguez etc.  Wood is the same age as Miller and is better defensively, with a better hit tool.  Miller has great zone discipline and gets a lot of HBP.  The team must like him a bit, but I would rather have Wood as my AA/AAA catcher prospect this season.

  • Like 2
Posted
12 hours ago, biedergb said:

I hope not. I have him higher on the depth chart just after the big top 2, and ahead of Miller and Rodriguez etc.  Wood is the same age as Miller and is better defensively, with a better hit tool.  Miller has great zone discipline and gets a lot of HBP.  The team must like him a bit, but I would rather have Wood as my AA/AAA catcher prospect this season.

I agree. Just afraid scouts might, too.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/7/2025 at 11:04 AM, biedergb said:

I hope not. I have him higher on the depth chart just after the big top 2, and ahead of Miller and Rodriguez etc.  Wood is the same age as Miller and is better defensively, with a better hit tool.  Miller has great zone discipline and gets a lot of HBP.  The team must like him a bit, but I would rather have Wood as my AA/AAA catcher prospect this season.

Agreed. For me its very clearly Quero-Dinges-Wood and then everyone else.

  • Like 1
Posted

Catchers are hard to stash through Rule 5, and historically there haven't been many to stick, though Liam Hicks worked out well for the Marlins. Maybe a team that genuinely expects their starter to play almost every day could pull it off? Even if there's some risk in losing Wood, it's still the right move to leave him unprotected. Pitchers will always be the most common picks in rule 5, and none of the ones we've left unprotected would be insurmountable losses.

The price of having talent is that you can't keep it all, things like Smith are just going to happen. Be glad the Brewers have depth that they can have a mild setback like that and keep chugging along.

We'll know soon...

Posted

The good news on Wood is there are a couple of catching prospects available who are generally rated above him. Honestly I think one of the pitchers is more likely to be taken.

It will be interesting to see if the Brewers take anyone. I doubt he lasts long enough, but I am stuck on Cameron Cauley.

Posted

I'd like us to take a pitcher. See how he does in ST and maybe you strike gold. For every Connor Thomas and Gus Varland there is a Shane Smith or Brad Keller

 

Posted

I think this was expected in the minor league portion of the rule 5 draft.  There just wasn’t enough room to keep all of them.

  • Like 3
Posted
Just now, nate82 said:

I think this was expected in the minor league portion of the rule 5 draft.  There just wasn’t enough room to keep all of them.

But there was! AAA was at 27. Limit is 37 I think?

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Posted

Seeing the Yankees select Hansel Rincon...I'm hearing they only narrowed in on the player after reading Jim's elaborate and clarifying Transaction posts.

  • Like 1
  • WHOA SOLVDD 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...