He used a perfectly acceptable and accurate tense. He used present tense, which is allowed for things that have occurred in the past and continue to the present. The only events he described were in the past. He described them as inevitably continuing in any & all future events. That is incorrect, and as Casey pointed out, juvenile. And maybe you think I'm wasting everyone's time by discussing this... honestly doesn't change how I feel about it. I think a huge problem in fans' perceptions of baseball is the unchecked power those paid to inform them of the games have. I hate when an announcer says, '[Player X] is a .294 hitter' just because that happens to be player X's current batting average. While in any single occurance the significance is admittedly small, the cumulative effect imho leads to a large exchange of erroneous information. And yes, I am a huge nerd, both as a baseball fan & a grammar 'fan'