To me it seems that the argument by Gammons, etc. is a bit flawed because isn't revenue sharing based on revenues and not payroll (expenditures) or profit? I will not claim to be an expert on how the system works, so I looked this up on fangraphs: http://www.fangraphs.com/library/index.php/business/revenue-sharing/ Please feel free to correct me on this if I'm mistaken, but what I got from that is that all teams contribute a percentage of their local revenue to a fund which is then split equally across the teams... basically meaning that the big dollar teams pay in more than they get back and vice-versa. Looking at the Astros, they are in one of the bigger markets in baseball, so I would think that they would have a pretty solid revenue stream going. Has it been confirmed that they are getting a big chunk of revenue sharing? Being in that market, I can't believe that it would be much, and if it is, someone down there is doing something wrong.