i'll agree with that for the most part, FV. certainly the Top 5 candidates for most every job could do the work and have the experience, but it's just that odd thing you can't really describe why one of those five gets the job over the other--same thing as explaining why one girl likes you when another doesn't. to your post, i would add either the in-between job you mentioned, or doing some charity work. you gotta fight the stereotype that unemployed people just sit around all day and do nothing. though i'm still debating Austin or Boise, i'll have that opportunity to move anywhere in the US at basically the drop of a hat. but it seems tough that unless you're interviewing for a high-paying job, you have to pay your own way to the interview. pay your way only a few times and that's hugely expensive. i know you can do phone interviews, but the employer will want to see you at some point before you're hired. to this, i'll ask employers if i have a realistic shot at the job before i pay to go there, but it's still hard to always trust that i have a decent and equal shot at the job. "Willing to relocate" to me is more about cutting off your job search in one city after a set period of time and then moving elsewhere, instead of applying for a job that's 500 miles away. not to mention in this market, companies have plenty of candidates that i'm sure they don't want to bother with the hassle of a long-distance applicant.