Given what you said, isn't it possible Marcum would have cost more than Bush? Less service time and better K and BB rates would make Marcum a more valuable commodity than Bush and therefore cost more in trade, in my opinion. I think Melvin built the Brewers the right way. Taking safe guys with low ceilings got us to .500 and that is what we needed to do to win back fan support. Without a high attendance we would still have a payroll below $60M. The best thing for the franchise right now would have been blowing up the roster soon after Mark A. bought the team but I highly doubt that would have been allowed. It isn't misunderstood. Many people, and the front office apparently, didn't feel Escobar was ready for the majors. It could be debated that he still isn't. I would argue that the Hardy trade was trading a guy for a high risk player. Gomez certainly has potential but has done little to show he is going to be more than an average player even including his great defense. How many teams have actually traded for an impact pitcher? Just a page back TLB posted a link. I would think it is safe to say if their names came up, he tried to get them. I think we can say he just wasn't able to swing a deal. There is plenty of evidence to support the fact that Melvin has tried to acquire pitching. We don't have the pitching to trade for good pitching and we really don't have the bats to trade for it either, other than Fielder. There is little reason to believe Mark A. would have found trading players and taking a small step back acceptable.