Tampa beat the Packers twice. 1st game was a total blow-out, 38-10. Packers lost. 2nd game was for a chance to go to the Super Bowl, the biggest game on the planet. Tampa had to go to Lambeau, weather, yada, yada, yada. Packers lost. Nothing you can say will convince me that Tampa is not a better team based on those two things alone. Packers played Tampa twice, and lost twice. Tampa is the better team. Didn't you say just a few days ago that the Week 6 matchup didn't really matter in regards to yesterday's game? Bucs were the better team yesterday. But nothing you can say will convince me that if those same teams played 10 times, the Packers wouldn't win 8 of them. But congrats to the Bucs. Typically the "hired gun mercenary" approach doesn't work in the NFL, but in the Bucs' case, it has. I sure did, but that was before the championship game. Before that game was played, you just couldn't put it all on the previous game. In the grand scheme of things, after 2 games have been played, it surely does matter... Play a team 2 times in the NFL, lose them both, the winning team is the better team. End of story. You can justify this all you want. The Packers had 2 tries to beat them, they failed both times. Tampa is the better team, whether you want to admit it or not. So you think if the Bucs played the Packers 8 more times, they would win all 8, even after losing the last two? lol Ok man, that is quite a hill to die on, but have at it...