Sorry, I guess I'm just getting antsy. I don't get how some posters are ready to throw Woodruff, Broxton and more at Machado, while the same guys are saying Burnes is untouchable. I mean is it simply because Burnes is less known? Both have solid middle of the rotation profiles. Woodruff is about 20 months older than Burnes. I mean, it's gotta be because Woodruff has ben kicking around the system longer, and already has MLB experience, right? Are we going to be looking at Burnes the same way at this time next year if he doesn't dominate at the MLB level? To me the two are interchangeable. We are going to HAVE to give up something to get Machado. If Woodruff gets it done, hen itneeds to get done. If it's Burnes, most would rather not go that route. It is what it is, but someone is going to have to go, and if it is between Peralta, Burnes and Woodruff, I'd say bye bye Woodruff, like right now.