"I don't think you can say that at all." I agree completely. Rock, you're making an awfully large amount of assumptions here with very little corroborating evidence. It's fine if you want to debate Narveson's merits as an SP and question who would be better between him and Capuano, but assuming that the Brewers lowballed him or pushed him out seems to go against everything said to the media. The Brewers had an offer out to him well before any trades were made, and Capuano broke off negotiations to test the market. That's a completely reasonable thing to do for both sides. The Brewers, instead of waiting, went ahead and got the 2 starters they needed, and Cappy realized that it lowered the possibility of him getting what he really wanted tremendously, and turned down the contract. "I'd say an offer of less than $1.5 million is, by definition, low ball" We don't know what the base salary offer was, but it could have very easily been that high (or higher) but not had nearly as many incentives as the offer the Mets gave him. This comes off, to me, as a business decision and had nothing to do with personal feelings. Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I think it's a more fair assumption based upon known data than something else more sinister.