With the Brewers upside, yes indeed the Brewer rotation could be better. But if both were healthy would you rather have Hamels or Sheets? I'd take Hamels on pure stuff, but I can understand taking Sheets. Everyone but Suppan is an "if" in the Brewer rotation. I think Myers and Dempster are going to do well. They are veterans with quality arms. I think Lily will continue to do well because his difference was in switching leagues. Well, he's still in the lousier league and he still gets to face the pitcher 1 in 9. If they don't do well, then I'm wrong about the Phillies and Cubs. Nothing would please me more. But that still leaves us considerably short of the Mets and Diamondbacks. I know that this means nothing around here, and in many ways I agree with the assessment, but listening to Dibble and Kennedy last night on XM, both didn't even have the Brewers on their radar. Kennedy picked Cubs, Cards, Astros, Reds and never even mentioned the Brewers until a caller made the point about the Crew, and then Kennedy did say he liked the Brewers. But both mentioned that Cappy was gone, the Vargas cut was unexplainable, Sheets is always hurt. My point is not that they are right about their individual points, but the Brewers' "ifs' seems so much bigger to some than other teams. Hey I like Villy and Parra alot, but it still doesn't mean that they're proven. Bush and Suppan are solid, but I just don't think they're the kind of pitchers that get you in the playoffs, although once there Soup seems to turn it up a notch for whatever reason. And as a 1/2 combo Sheets and Gallardo don't really strike fear into the opposition I think. Now, having said all that, I admit I probably overstated the Phillies rotation and am more inclined to say you got the best of me there Gopher. Thanks.