I guess I'm the only one who thinks that admission standards should be uniform across the board for all schools, but I also realize that would be extremely difficult given private vs. public schools, different courses, how courses translate, etc. I do think academic standards should be high, but I also think they should be fair for all schools. It's hard enough to get kids to come to UW to begin with, much less have to deal with higher admission standards than other schools. If that's the way that people want it, then the best we can ever expect the football team to do is what Bielema did (and then we can say we ran the best coach we ever had out of town), and expect 10-3/9-4 seasons moving forward. For those who say, "Stanford is doing it", well they just finished a 7-5 season and play Maryland in the Foster Farms Bowl in Santa Clara. Yes, they played in four consecutive BCS bowls (UW played in three consecutive), but they didn't even go to a bowl in 2008. Or 2007. Or 2006, when they were 1-11. [sarcasm]Sounds like a good program to aspire to be.[/sarcasm] They got lucky with a famous former NFL player as a coach hire who then bolted for the NFL after four years, and are now sinking back to mediocrity. They also have a feeewww more connections to the tech billionaires in Silicon Valley than UW, a big recruiting draw to that school. I also think (see my post on Lambeauleap.net), based on my knowledge of UW, that high academic standards for admission is a bit of a smokescreen and the real motivator is economic and getting more foreign and out-of-state students paying higher tuition bills (versus in-state kids and scholarship athletes). They know the football stadium will always be full, the TV contract with the Big Ten will always be there, and the way to increase revenue is to bring in more foreign and out-of-state rich kids and they need to justify that.