RU, your post inspired me to search the Capital Newspapers archives, and I am having a devil of a time finding much of anything relevant to the January WSJ redesign. And I daresay it's not like I lack online searching skills. Edit: I found some, finally. (If Capital Newspapers really believes the internet is the future, they have to make their website easier to navigate.) From WSJ editor Ellen Foley, around the time of the redesign debut: ! debuts Saturday. We also call this section [bang], a slang reference to the exclamation point in computer programming codes. The exclamation point has had many nicknames since the days of printers: screamer, startler, shriek, screech and pling. We liked the definitive [bang] as a nod to the people whose work dances across our screens on the Web and as an embrace of the explosive and high-energy life not often celebrated in local publications. We also noted that in today's e-mail etiquette (and editors' opening sentences), users often use multiple explanation points as a way to emphasize news that's startling, surprising or just plain entertaining. That's what ! [bang] will offer with the latest trends, fashions and gotta-see-it events in our region. If you happen to be in the "don't-gotta-have-it" group, this section will be a must-read so you can understand the younger set that came up with this section name. And from the first [bang] section on January 12, three things to know about [bang]: 1. The name. In type, it's the symbol "!," which is easier to type than that thing Prince called himself for a while. In speech, we call it bang, which comes from computer program-ese. 2. The vibe. It's irreverent, fun, stylish, nerdy, goofy, hipster-groover, retro, mod, futuristic, fresh ... in other words, anything goes. (Well, almost anything; it's still a family newspaper. 3. The stuff. Here's where you'll find Ridley, doling out (unsolicited, of course) rules to live by; profiles of night spots around town; tips on what's cool and what's hot (so often the same thing, no?); stories about things that get people talking, and this, the three things. Your turn: This is where you can sound off on, or extol the virtues of, whatever you want. Pick a topic, write three things about it, and you're halfway there. Send it to us at getpublished@madison.com, with "bang!" in the subject line and include your name, location and a phone number, and you could see your words in print. It's that easy. It looks to me like the WSJ is striving to minimize the news/story-creating effort for its staff - whether it's running more and more stories from AP or other media services, or relying increasingly on reader input. Not that there should be no reader input, but when you begin posting people's weekend plans as newspaper content (as they now do on Fridays), how is that news? I assume cost-cutting is the prime objective, but I suspect the braintrust at WSJ thinks their new product achieves more than a better bottom line.