And again, I'll point out that the strawman arguments that have been thrown out around here (even in a sarcastic manner) is that the people in favor of rebuilds "don't want to win" and only want to get prospects to trade for more prospects and never want to pay anyone. These things are all false. The truth of this strategy is that you have to selectively pick and choose which players you will extend (say, a McCutcheon, or a Longoria, or a Tulowitzki, or Braun)...but saying you will NEVER EXTEND ANYONE! is false. Saying that you trade prospects for more prospects is also false. While it may be a means to achieve an end, it's not the end goal. Saying that acquiring prospects instead of winning is the end goal is also false. Winning is the end goal. Tampa won 90 games or more in 5 years out of 6, and won an AL pennant. Obviously they had some lean years before that streak and had some high draft picks in order to do that. But they traded well, and didn't give out many ridiculous contracts, or big contracts to old, high priced FA's. Obviously the end goal is to win the WS, and they were right on the doorstep of doing that. The goal is NOT TO ACQUIRE PROSPECTS in this strategy, but in fact, to win enough games to make the playoffs, and win a world series. I don't know how much more clearly those of us who espouse this strategy can be. It is not the only strategy. It's not necessarily the best strategy. But for a small market team, it's certainly a workable strategy if you have patience and an ability to draft well.