I used "silly" in response to Ram's use of the same word. I probably should not have done that so apologies. In regards to the Strasburg comment: To make it obvious - would you have had Stephen Strasburg below a different Nats prospect after they signed him simply because he hadn't thrown a pro pitch? Of course not. Because it was painfully obvious that Strasburg was better. While not as blatant, the same thing applies here. Roache's tools and upside outweigh the fact that Morris is closer to the majors. I understand he's not comparing Strasburg to Morris. But there are a select few prospects where you don't need to see them in the minors in order to produce a ranking. Strasburg was one, probably Price and even Mark Prior. I don't know if there's been a hitting prospect in the last 20 years that you could say the same except probably Bryce Harper, Joe Mauer, Josh Hamilton, and A-Rod. So basically you're taking a sample of roughly 10 guys over the last 20 years and applying it to all prospects. Small sample alert! Obviously, this is just my opinion and people can rank guys where they want to (it's all subjective anyway). I just think Strasburg and Co. are in a different stratosphere from the rest of them.