According to Tom Tango's survey, Durham has been worse than Weeks for a few years now. Obviously that doesn't mean everything, but I think the fact that Giants fans think less of Durham's defense than Brewers fans think of Weeks' is noteworthy. It really depends on what stats you look at. Someone posted a link in this thread that says he's above average offensively and defensively. I don't know if that's true (particularly the defensive stats, which I don't put a whole lot of stock into), but most of his offensive stats have been very close to average for ALL players, not just 2B. If you compare them only to 2B, Weeks looks very good - on the previous page of this thread, I posted a list of regular starters in the AL East who have an OPS+ in 2008 worse than Weeks. Every team had at least 2 of them, and most of them were middle infielders. The Utley comparison is actually quite interesting. His numbers before 2005 were similar to Weeks' current career totals, Utley just had a little more SLG and a little less OBP. Remember, Chase Utley is 4 years older than Weeks, and his breakout year didn't come until age 26 - the same age Weeks will be next season. Weeks had much better offensive numbers in the minors and slightly better numbers in the majors before age 26, so it's hard to argue that its impossible for Weeks to follow that same path. I'm not saying that Weeks will be an MVP-type player next year - Utley's breakout season was highly improbable - but it can't be considered to be out of the question, especially for a player with so much talent.